Re: Parallel vacuum workers prevent the oldest xmin from advancing
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
From: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
To: John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2021-11-25T03:30:20Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 7:46 PM John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 7:28 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > The patch looks good to me. But I can't come up with a stable test for > > > this. It seems to be hard without stopping and resuming parallel > > > vacuum workers. Do you have any good idea? > > > > > > > No, let's wait for a day or so to see if anybody else has any ideas to > > write a test for this case, otherwise, I'll check these once again and > > push. > > I set this "committed" in the CF app. > Thanks! -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
Commits
-
Fix parallel operations that prevent oldest xmin from advancing.
- 33b6dd83e26f 13.6 landed
- ead49ebc07a7 14.2 landed
- 0f0cfb494004 15.0 landed