Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Tighten the concurrent abort check during decoding.
- 2ce353fc1902 14.0 landed
-
Improve hash_create()'s API for some added robustness.
- b3817f5f7746 14.0 landed
-
Use HASH_BLOBS for xidhash.
- a1b8aa1e4eec 14.0 landed
-
Fix initialization of RelationSyncEntry for streaming transactions.
- 69bd60672af6 14.0 landed
-
Remove unused function declaration in logicalproto.h.
- ddd5f6d2609b 14.0 landed
-
Add additional tests to test streaming of in-progress transactions.
- 58b5ae9d62bd 14.0 landed
-
Fix inline marking introduced in commit 464824323e.
- ac15b499f7f9 14.0 landed
-
Add support for streaming to built-in logical replication.
- 464824323e57 14.0 landed
-
Fix the SharedFileSetUnregister API.
- 4ab77697f67a 14.0 landed
-
Fix comment in procarray.c
- 77c7267c37f7 14.0 cited
-
Suppress compiler warning in non-cassert builds.
- e942af7b8261 14.0 cited
-
Extend the BufFile interface.
- 808e13b282ef 14.0 landed
-
Mark a few logical decoding related variables with PGDLLIMPORT.
- b48cac3b10a0 14.0 landed
-
Implement streaming mode in ReorderBuffer.
- 7259736a6e5b 14.0 landed
-
Extend the logical decoding output plugin API with stream methods.
- 45fdc9738b36 14.0 landed
-
WAL Log invalidations at command end with wal_level=logical.
- c55040ccd017 14.0 landed
-
Immediately WAL-log subtransaction and top-level XID association.
- 0bead9af484c 14.0 landed
-
Allow logical replication to transfer data in binary format.
- 9de77b545313 14.0 cited
-
Only superuser can set sslcert/sslkey in postgres_fdw user mappings
- cebf9d6e6ee1 13.0 cited
-
Track statistics for spilling of changes from ReorderBuffer.
- 9290ad198b15 13.0 landed
-
Add logical_decoding_work_mem to limit ReorderBuffer memory usage.
- cec2edfa7859 13.0 landed
-
logical decoding: process ASSIGNMENT during snapshot build
- bac2fae05c77 13.0 cited
-
Emit invalidations to standby for transactions without xid.
- c6ff84b06a68 9.6.0 cited
On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 7:53 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 4:56 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 3:59 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > I thin for our use case BufFileCreateShared is more suitable. I think > > > we need to do some modifications so that we can use these apps without > > > SharedFileSet. Otherwise, we need to unnecessarily need to create > > > SharedFileSet for each transaction and also need to maintain it in xid > > > array or xid hash until transaction commit/abort. So I suggest > > > following modifications in shared files set so that we can > > > conveniently use it. > > > 1. ChooseTablespace(const SharedFileSet fileset, const char name) > > > if fileset is NULL then select the DEFAULTTABLESPACEOID > > > 2. SharedFileSetPath(char path, SharedFileSet fileset, Oid tablespace) > > > If fileset is NULL then in directory path we can use MyProcPID or > > > something instead of fileset->creator_pid. > > > > > > > Hmm, I find these modifications a bit ad-hoc. So, not sure if it is > > better than the patch maintains sharedfileset information. > > I think we might do something better here, maybe by supplying function > pointer or so, but maintaining sharedfileset which contains different > tablespace/mutext which we don't need at all for our purpose also > doesn't sound very appealing. > I think we can say something similar for Relation (rel cache entry as well) maintained in LogicalRepRelMapEntry. I think we only need a pointer to that information. > Let me see if I can not come up with > some clean way of avoiding the need to shared-fileset then maybe we > can go with the shared fileset idea. > Fair enough. .. > > > > > > But, even if nsubxacts become 0 we want to write the file so that we > > > can overwrite the previous info. > > > > > > > Can't we just remove the file for such a case? > > But, as of now, we expect if it is not a first-time stream start then > the file exists. > Isn't it primarily because we do subxact_info_write in stop stream which will create such a file irrespective of whether we have any subxacts? If so, isn't that an unnecessary write? > Actually, currently, it's very easy that if it is > not the first segment we always expect that the file must exist, > otherwise an error. > I think we can check if the file doesn't exist then we can initialize nsubxacts as 0. > Now if it is not the first segment then we will > need to handle multiple cases. > > a) subxact_info_read need to handle the error case, because the file > may not exist because there was no subxact in last stream or it was > deleted because nsubxact become 0. > b) subxact_info_write, there will be multiple cases that if nsubxact > was already 0 then we can avoid writing the file, but if it become 0 > now we need to remove the file. > > Let me think more on that. > I feel we should be able to deal with these cases but if you find any difficulty then let us discuss. I understand there is some ease if we always have subxacts file but OTOH it sounds quite awkward that we need so many file operations to detect the case whether the transaction has any subtransactions. > > > > Here, we have performed Rolledback to savepoint s1 which doesn't have > > any change of its own. I think this would have handled but just > > wanted to confirm. > > But internally, that will send abort for the s2 first, and for that, > we will find xid and truncate, and later we will send abort for s1 but > that we will not find and do nothing? Anyway, I will test it and let > you know. > It would be good if we can test and confirm this behavior once. If it is not very inconvenient then we can even try to include a test for the same in the patch. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com