Horton

Re: Fix for parallel BTree initialization bug

Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>, "Jameson, Hunter 'James'" <hunjmes@amazon.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Robert Haas <rhaas@postgresql.org>, Rahila Syed <rahila.syed@2ndquadrant.com>
Date: 2020-09-15T02:58:38Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 11:26 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 5:37 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I am planning to push this tomorrow after doing testing on
> > back-branches. Let me know if you have any comments.
>
> The fix seems sensible to me.
>

Thanks, I think it is better to wait for a day or two as yesterday
only we stamped 13 and we need to backpatch this.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

Commits

  1. Update parallel BTree scan state when the scan keys can't be satisfied.

  2. btree: Support parallel index scans.