Re: [HACKERS][PATCH] adding simple sock check for windows
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
From: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
To: CharSyam <charsyam@gmail.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2018-03-31T06:17:47Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 11:42 AM, CharSyam <charsyam@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, Amit, It's good question. I also thought about it. > > But, I want to leave original code intention. > > Actually I think there is no case ( slot->sock is not PGINVALID_SOCKET > and slot->sock < 0) > > but if original code want to check (sock < -1) > If you see the code of PQsocket, then that won't be possible. > I think it is better to leave that condition. > > but I think slot->sock == PGINVALID_SOCKET is enough > It is up to you, but I don't see any reason to retain the old check. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Fix assorted issues in parallel vacuumdb.
- ba0c65ab0922 9.5.13 landed
- 94173d3eeb44 11.0 landed
- 80bfdc0ccda0 10.4 landed
- 6cd110c477b4 9.6.9 landed