Re: [HACKERS][PATCH] adding simple sock check for windows

Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>

From: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
To: CharSyam <charsyam@gmail.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2018-03-31T06:17:47Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 11:42 AM, CharSyam <charsyam@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, Amit, It's good question. I also thought about it.
>
> But, I want to leave original code intention.
>
> Actually I think there is no case ( slot->sock is not PGINVALID_SOCKET
> and slot->sock < 0)
>
> but if original code want to check (sock < -1)
>

If you see the code of PQsocket, then that won't be possible.


> I think it is better to leave that condition.
>
> but I think slot->sock == PGINVALID_SOCKET is enough
>

It is up to you, but I don't see any reason to retain the old check.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com


Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Fix assorted issues in parallel vacuumdb.