Horton

Re: range test for hash index?

Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Paul A Jungwirth <pj@illuminatedcomputing.com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@iki.fi>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-09-27T04:18:07Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 6:02 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 4:03 AM Tomas Vondra
> <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > By "inconsistent" you mean that pre-10 versions will have different
> > expected output than versions with WAL-logged hash indexes?
> >
>
> Yes.
>
> > I don't see
> > why that would be a reason not to backpatch to all supported versions,
> > considering we already have the same difference for other test suites.
> >
>
> Yeah, I also think so.  I will do this today.
>

Pushed.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Commits

  1. Fix oversight in commit 4429f6a9e3e12bb4af6e3677fbc78cd80f160252.

  2. Support range data types.