Re: Logical Replication of sequences
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Doc: Add documentation for sequence synchronization.
- 55cefadde874 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Remove unused assignment in CREATE PUBLICATION grammar.
- bfb7419b0bbe 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add seq_sync_error_count to subscription statistics.
- f6a4c498dcf6 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Fix few issues in commit 5509055d69.
- 5a4eba558aa7 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add sequence synchronization for logical replication.
- 5509055d6956 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add worker type argument to logical replication worker functions.
- 3e8e05596a02 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Introduce "REFRESH SEQUENCES" for subscriptions.
- f0b3573c3aac 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Refactor logical worker synchronization code into a separate file.
- 41c674d2e31e 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Standardize use of REFRESH PUBLICATION in code and messages.
- 2436b8c047ff 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add "ALL SEQUENCES" support to publications.
- 96b378497346 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Expose sequence page LSN via pg_get_sequence_data.
- b93172ca59f4 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Resume conflict-relevant data retention automatically.
- 0d48d393d465 19 (unreleased) cited
-
Post-commit review fixes for 228c370868.
- 1f7e9ba3ac4e 19 (unreleased) cited
-
Generate GUC tables from .dat file
- 63599896545c 19 (unreleased) cited
On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 8:49 AM shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 5:28 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 2:36 PM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, 2 Aug 2024 at 14:24, shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 9:26 AM shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 4:17 PM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for reporting this, these issues are fixed in the attached > > > > > > v20240730_2 version patch. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I was reviewing the design of patch003, and I have a query. Do we need > > > > to even start an apply worker and create replication slot when > > > > subscription created is for 'sequences only'? IIUC, currently logical > > > > replication apply worker is the one launching sequence-sync worker > > > > whenever needed. I think it should be the launcher doing this job and > > > > thus apply worker may even not be needed for current functionality of > > > > sequence sync? > > > > > > > But that would lead to maintaining all sequence-sync of each > > subscription by launcher. Say there are 100 sequences per subscription > > and some of them from each subscription are failing due to some > > reasons then the launcher will be responsible for ensuring all the > > sequences are synced. I think it would be better to handle > > per-subscription work by the apply worker. > > I thought we can give that task to sequence-sync worker. Once sequence > sync worker is started by launcher, it keeps on syncing until all the > sequences are synced (even failed ones) and then exits only after all > are synced; instead of apply worker starting it multiple times for > failed sequences. Launcher to start sequence sync worker when signaled > by 'alter-sub refresh seq'. > But after going through details given by Vignesh in [1], I also see > the benefits of using apply worker for this task. Since apply worker > is already looping and doing that for table-sync, we can reuse the > same code for sequence sync and maintenance will be easy. So looks > okay if we go with existing apply worker design. > Fair enough. However, I was wondering whether apply_worker should exit after syncing all sequences for a sequence-only subscription or should it be there for future commands that can refresh the subscription and add additional tables or sequences? -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.