Re: BUG #16663: DROP INDEX did not free up disk space: idle connection hold file marked as deleted
Neil Chen <carpenter.nail.cz@gmail.com>
From: Nail Carpenter <carpenter.nail.cz@gmail.com>
To: Pavel Borisov <pashkin.elfe@gmail.com>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Date: 2020-11-20T01:50:46Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs, pgsql-hackers
Yes, It's my fault. You're right.
Pavel Borisov <pashkin.elfe@gmail.com> 于2020年11月19日周四 下午11:55写道:
> One thing that doesn't matter is that the modify here seems unnecessary,
>> right?
>>
>> > mdunlinkfork(RelFileNodeBackend rnode, ForkNumber forkNum, bool isRedo)
>> > {
>> > char *path;
>> > - int ret;
>> > + int ret = 0;
>> > path = relpath(rnode, forkNum
>
>
> I suppose it is indeed necessary as otherwise the result of the comparison
> is not defined in case of 'else' block in the mdunlinkfork() :
> 346 else
> 347 {
> 348 /* Prevent other backends' fds from holding on to the disk
> space */
> 349 do_truncate(path);
> .....
> 356 * Delete any additional segments.
> 357 */
> 358 if (ret >= 0)
> ----------^^^^^^^
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Pavel Borisov
>
> Postgres Professional: http://postgrespro.com <http://www.postgrespro.com>
>
So in the present logic, *ret* is always 0 if it is not in recovery mode
(and other *if* conditions are not satisfied). But when the *if* condition
is satisfied, it is possible to skip the deletion of additional segments.
Considering that our goal is to always try to unlink additional segments,
*ret* seems unnecessary here. The code flow looks like:
> if (isRedo || .....)
> {
> int ret; /* move to here */
> ....
> }
> else
> { }
>
> /* Delete any additional segments. */
> if (true)
> ...
Or is there any reason to allow us to skip the attempt to delete additional
segments in recovery mode?
Commits
-
Use truncate(2) where appropriate.
- 57faaf376e19 14.0 landed
-
Free disk space for dropped relations on commit.
- e00928de8d22 9.5.25 landed
- d0bbe2122099 9.6.21 landed
- 22701755dc64 10.16 landed
- d5706ad7b70a 11.11 landed
- 50f338574242 12.6 landed
- fd3a75d820a4 13.2 landed
- 9f35f943732e 14.0 landed
-
Rename the "point is strictly above/below point" comparison operators.
- 0cc993278888 14.0 cited