Horton

Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory

Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>

View thread
From: Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, Rob Wultsch <wultsch@gmail.com>, Joshua Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-09-22T08:36:50Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On 4 May 2011 16:30, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> To make PG do it automatically, we'd need to store the _init forks in
>> a different tablespace from the remaining forks.  That's probably
>> possible, but it seems complicated.
>
> Sounds much better way actually and also quite easy. All we do is keep
> the init forks in a subdirectory that identifies the tablespace they
> relate to.

So are there any plans to allow swappable drive/volatile storage
unlogged tables?

-- 
Thom Brown
Twitter: @darkixion
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux user: #516935

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company