Re: Translations contributions urgently needed
Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>
From: Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>,
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp>,
Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2018-02-23T13:28:17Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 23 February 2018 at 04:04, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes: >> Please join pgsql-translators@postgresql.org. > > What surprises me about this thread is that apparently the sad state > of the v10 translations wasn't already discussed on that list? > > I have no objection to calling for more translation volunteers on > this list --- in fact, probably it'd be a good idea to call for > more help on pgsql-general, too. But it doesn't seem like it's > quite on-topic for -hackers otherwise. Something that isn't clear to me is, for a language that didn't meet 80% translation for a component, if it does reach 80% after the major version release, does it then get shipped in a minor release, or is out of that version completely until the next major version? Thom