Re: Translations contributions urgently needed

Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>

From: Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2018-02-23T13:28:17Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 23 February 2018 at 04:04, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:
>> Please join pgsql-translators@postgresql.org.
>
> What surprises me about this thread is that apparently the sad state
> of the v10 translations wasn't already discussed on that list?
>
> I have no objection to calling for more translation volunteers on
> this list --- in fact, probably it'd be a good idea to call for
> more help on pgsql-general, too.  But it doesn't seem like it's
> quite on-topic for -hackers otherwise.

Something that isn't clear to me is, for a language that didn't meet
80% translation for a component, if it does reach 80% after the major
version release, does it then get shipped in a minor release, or is
out of that version completely until the next major version?

Thom