Horton

Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files

Florents Tselai <florents.tselai@gmail.com>

View thread
From: Florents Tselai <florents.tselai@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com>, "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>, Corey Huinker <corey.huinker@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-09-01T10:35:12Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Attachments

On 4 Aug 2025, at 4:09 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:


On 2025-07-29 Tu 11:40 AM, Tom Lane wrote:

Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:

OK. I'm inclined to do this after the CF finishes, to avoid collisions
with other patches. I assume it's going to make the CFbot fairly unhappy.

+1 for proceeding that way.  (I did not look at whether the proposed
changes are sane, but I agree that this'll inevitably break a lot of
pending patches.)




Done.



While working on this https://commitfest.postgresql.org/patch/6020/
I discovered that when changing for func/func-aggregate.sgml, the HTML
wasn’t marked for update.

IIUC the doc/Makefile should be updated as attached, right ?