Thread

  1. Re: [PATCH] Fix null pointer dereference in PG19

    Paul A Jungwirth <pj@illuminatedcomputing.com> — 2026-05-15T21:21:48Z

    On Thu, Apr 23, 2026 at 9:45 PM jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com> wrote:
    >
    > On Tue, Apr 21, 2026 at 11:24 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
    > >
    > > * I'd tend to move the anti-FDW check to execution too.
    > > It's not actively wrong, since nowadays we don't permit
    > > relations to change relkind, but it seems out of place.
    > > Also, it seems inadequate to deal with the case of a target
    > > that is a partitioned table having FDW partitions.
    > >
    > Hi.
    >
    > Instead of adding another subnode in CheckValidResultRel,
    > I am passing ModifyTable to it, this will be more future-proof.
    
    Thank you for working on this! I started a new thread at [1] so that I
    could give it a commitfest entry.
    
    Your patch looks great to me. I didn't notice that you had posted one,
    so I made my own, but yours is better. Doing the check in
    CheckValidResultRel makes a lot of sense.
    
    I thought there was one other case we should test for: when a
    partition has a child FDW that gets pruned, we should not raise an
    error. So I swapped in my own tests, which were otherwise similar to
    yours.
    
    That new thread also includes a patch to move the functionality check
    into plan-time.
    
    [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BrenyUte0_UJsJiDJQi82oaBsMJn%3Dcct0Wn%3DvOqXtuDn%3DYYJA%40mail.gmail.com
    
    Yours,
    
    -- 
    Paul              ~{:-)
    pj@illuminatedcomputing.com