Re: SQL:2011 Application Time Update & Delete
Paul A Jungwirth <pj@illuminatedcomputing.com>
From: Paul A Jungwirth <pj@illuminatedcomputing.com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
Cc: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-12-18T22:41:16Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- v64-0003-Add-isolation-tests-for-UPDATE-DELETE-FOR-PORTIO.patch (text/x-patch)
- v64-0004-Add-tg_temporal-to-TriggerData.patch (text/x-patch)
- v64-0005-Look-up-additional-temporal-foreign-key-helper-p.patch (text/x-patch)
- v64-0001-Add-range_get_constructor2.patch (text/x-patch)
- v64-0002-Add-UPDATE-DELETE-FOR-PORTION-OF.patch (text/x-patch)
- v64-0006-Add-CASCADE-SET-NULL-SET-DEFAULT-for-temporal-fo.patch (text/x-patch)
- v64-0007-Expose-FOR-PORTION-OF-to-plpgsql-triggers.patch (text/x-patch)
On Fri, Dec 5, 2025 at 4:42 PM Paul A Jungwirth
<pj@illuminatedcomputing.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2025 at 7:44 AM Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> wrote:
> > Review of v62-0001-Document-temporal-update-delete.patch:
>
> Thanks for the review! Here are v63 patches addressing your feedback,
> plus some other things.
Rebased to fix some conflicts. I'm leaving out the final PERIODs patch
in this set. Maybe I will continue skipping it since it is frequently
the cause of rebase conflicts. And I think of it as a "next step"
after this other work is finished.
I don't think there's much else new here, except I expanded the main
patch's commit message a bit.
Rebased to d49936f3028.
Yours,
--
Paul ~{:-)
pj@illuminatedcomputing.com