Re: Assertion failure with barriers in parallel hash join
Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
From: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2020-09-29T08:12:13Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 7:11 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote: > #2 0x00000000009027d2 in ExceptionalCondition > (conditionName=conditionName@entry=0xa80846 "!barrier->static_party", > #4 0x0000000000682ebf in ExecParallelHashJoinNewBatch Thanks. Ohhh. I think I see how that condition was reached and what to do about it, but I'll need to look more closely. I'm away on vacation right now, and will update in a couple of days when I'm back at a real computer.
Commits
-
Fix race in parallel hash join batch cleanup, take II.
- ef16d27245f6 11.20 landed
- 44d44aa9712f 12.15 landed
- 6e94d62e3f04 13.11 landed
- 1b9e42e82ae6 14.8 landed
- c03c6e8cf6a9 15.3 landed
- 8d578b9b2e37 16.0 landed
-
Revert "Fix race in Parallel Hash Join batch cleanup."
- 7f7f25f15edb 14.0 landed
- 492f6e21038a 11.12 landed
- b9ed85698f3e 12.7 landed
- 69739ec317ae 13.3 landed
-
Fix race in Parallel Hash Join batch cleanup.
- 0129c56fbe5c 11.12 landed
- 8fa2478b407e 12.7 landed
- 4e0f0995e923 13.3 landed
- 3b8981b6e1a2 14.0 landed
-
Mop-up for wait event naming issues.
- 3048898e73c7 13.0 cited