Re: Move syncscan.c?

On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 6:28 AM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> On 2020-06-23 13:30:39 +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
> > I suppose it's remotely possible that someone might invent
> > physical-order index scans, and once you have those you might sync
> > scans of those too, and then even table would be too specific, but
> > that may be a bit far fetched.
>
> Hm. That'd be an argument for moving it to access/common. I don't really
> see a reason not to go for that?

Ok, done that way.  Thanks.