Re: meson's in-tree libpq header search order vs -Dextra_include_dirs
Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
From: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-10-31T21:13:38Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
ci: Add missing "set -e" to scripts run by su.
- c3359d1cf5e5 15.15 landed
- 4da1f66fae83 16.11 landed
- 61cd67425f1a 17.7 landed
- ae2381025a4c 18.1 landed
- cf638b46aff2 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Don't put library-supplied -L/-I switches before user-supplied ones.
- 4300d8b6a79d 19 (unreleased) cited
On Sat, Nov 1, 2025 at 7:14 AM Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> wrote: > The patch seems harmless enough to me, no objections to committing it. Thanks! > However, I'm worried that we'll soon break it again. The new rule is > apparently "include libpq first", but we have no way of enforcing it. Hmm, my meson-fu is weak, but there must surely be some way to declare that you want libpq and have it automatically put things in the right order, will look into that...