Re: meson's in-tree libpq header search order vs -Dextra_include_dirs

Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>

From: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-10-31T21:13:38Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. ci: Add missing "set -e" to scripts run by su.

  2. Don't put library-supplied -L/-I switches before user-supplied ones.

On Sat, Nov 1, 2025 at 7:14 AM Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> wrote:
> The patch seems harmless enough to me, no objections to committing it.

Thanks!

> However, I'm worried that we'll soon break it again. The new rule is
> apparently "include libpq first", but we have no way of enforcing it.

Hmm, my meson-fu is weak, but there must surely be some way to declare
that you want libpq and have it automatically put things in the right
order, will look into that...