Re: Collation version tracking for macOS
Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
From: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
To: Tobias Bussmann <t.bussmann@gmx.net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>
Date: 2022-06-10T05:56:35Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Fix copy&paste typo in comment
- 402388946fb3 17.0 cited
On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 12:48 PM Tobias Bussmann <t.bussmann@gmx.net> wrote: > Perhaps I can shed some light on this matter: Hi Tobias, Oh, thanks for your answers. Definitely a few bits of interesting archeology I was not aware of. > Apple's libc collations have always been a bit special in that concern, even for the non-UTF8 ones. Rooted in ancient FreeBSD they "try to keep collating table backward compatible with ASCII" thus upper and lower cases characters are separated (There are exceptions like 'cs_CZ.ISO8859-2'). Wow. I see that I can sort the English dictionary the way most people expect by pretending it's Czech. What a mess! > With your smoke test "sort /usr/share/dict/words" on a modern macOS you won't see a difference between "C" and "en_US.UTF-8" but with "( echo '5£'; echo '£5' ) | LC_COLLATE=en_US.UTF-8 sort" you can produce a difference against "( echo '5£'; echo '£5' ) | LC_COLLATE=C sort". Or test with "diff -q <(LC_COLLATE=C sort /usr/share/dict/words) <(LC_COLLATE=es_ES.UTF-8 sort /usr/share/dict/words)" I see, so it does *something*, just not what anybody wants.