Re: [PATCH] OAuth: fix performance bug with stuck multiplexer events
Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
From: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
To: Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>,
Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>, Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
Date: 2025-08-04T14:53:18Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
oauth: Always link with -lm for floor()
- e76738e59790 18.0 landed
- 52ecd05aeef8 19 (unreleased) landed
-
oauth: Add unit tests for multiplexer handling
- 4e1e417330d4 19 (unreleased) landed
- 1443b6c0eaa2 19 (unreleased) landed
-
oauth: Ensure unused socket registrations are removed
- 16b0c48583a5 18.0 landed
- 3d9c03429a82 19 (unreleased) landed
-
oauth: Remove expired timers from the multiplexer
- e507e08acf63 18.0 landed
- 1749a12f0d20 19 (unreleased) landed
-
oauth: Remove stale events from the kqueue multiplexer
- ff181d1f876f 18.0 landed
- ff5b0824b3b0 19 (unreleased) landed
-
oauth: Track total call count during a client flow
- 41aac1483a6c 18.0 landed
- 3e311664e497 19 (unreleased) landed
On Tue, Jul 29, 2025 at 8:52 AM Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 4:33 PM Jacob Champion > <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > > My plan, if this code seems reasonable, is to backport 0001-0003, but > > keep the larger 0004 on HEAD only until it has proven to be stable. > > It's a big new suite and I want to make sure it's not flapping on some > > buildfarm animal. Eventually I'll backport that too. > > Any thoughts on the approach? Too big/too scary/too BSD-specific? > > A small bit of self-review: a comment I wrote in the tests suggested > that the choice of readable/writable events was up to the multiplexer > implementation, but it *must* choose readable, due to the hardcoded > use of PGRES_POLLING_READING throughout the current code. Updated in > v2. [FYI, I'm looking into this and planning to post a review in 1-2 days...]