Horton

Re: pg_stat_statements vs. SELECT FOR UPDATE

Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
To: Sergei Kornilov <sk@zsrv.org>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>
Date: 2019-07-13T05:39:06Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 9:08 PM Sergei Kornilov <sk@zsrv.org> wrote:
> Patch is still applied cleanly on HEAD and passes check-world. I think ignoring FOR UPDATE clause is incorrect behavior.

With my reviewer hat: I agree.

With my CFM hat: It seems like this patch is ready to land so I have
set it to "Ready for Committer".  But don't worry if you were hoping
to review this and missed out, we have two more pg_stat_statements
patches that need your feedback!

https://commitfest.postgresql.org/23/2080/
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/23/1999/

-- 
Thomas Munro
https://enterprisedb.com

Commits

  1. Teach pg_stat_statements not to ignore FOR UPDATE clauses