Horton

Re: Autovacuum worker doesn't immediately exit on postmaster death

Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Victor Yegorov <vyegorov@gmail.com>, Alexander Kukushkin <cyberdemn@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2021-02-22T22:32:13Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 7:57 AM Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
> * Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> > The if-we're-going-to-delay-anyway path in vacuum_delay_point seems
> > OK to add a touch more overhead to, though.
>
> Alright, for this part at least, seems like it'd be something like the
> attached.
>
> Only lightly tested, but does seem to address the specific example which
> was brought up on this thread.
>
> Thoughts..?

+1

Commits

  1. Use a WaitLatch for vacuum/autovacuum sleeping