Re: Cannot find a working 64-bit integer type on Illumos

Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>

From: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Tomas Vondra <tomas@vondra.me>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>, Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-03-25T08:41:21Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Mar 5, 2025 at 6:00 AM Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> wrote:
> I agree with your patch 0001-Deprecate-pg_int64.patch.  I don't see a
> reason to keep the current arrangement around pg_int64.

Thanks for looking!  Pushed.



Commits

  1. Move pg_int64 back to postgres_ext.h

  2. pgbench: Make set_random_seed() 64-bit everywhere.

  3. Use PRI?64 instead of "ll?" in format strings (continued).

  4. Fix order of -I switches for building pg_regress.o.

  5. libpq: Deprecate pg_int64.

  6. Use PRI*64 instead of "ll*" in format strings (minimal trial)

  7. Fix header inclusion order in c.h.

  8. Use <stdint.h> and <inttypes.h> for c.h integers.

  9. Remove traces of BeOS.

  10. More correct way to check for existence of types, which allows to specify