Re: pg_tablespace_location() failure with allow_in_place_tablespaces
Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
From: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2022-03-15T10:16:52Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 10:30 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote: > So, which one of a relative path or an absolute path do you think > would be better for the user? My preference tends toward the relative > path, as we know that all those tablespaces stay in pg_tblspc/ so one > can make the difference with normal tablespaces more easily. The > barrier is thin, though :p Sounds good to me.
Commits
-
Remove unnecessary Windows-specific basebackup code.
- 202b56ba91cb 15.0 landed
- 5344723755bd 16.0 landed
-
Fix get_dirent_type() for Windows junction points.
- fee0165fc1cf 14.5 landed
- 6d306ab73168 15.0 landed
- 9d3444dcce4d 16.0 landed
-
doc: Remove mention to in-place tablespaces for pg_tablespace_location()
- 7a7cd84893e0 15.0 landed
-
Fix pg_tablespace_location() with in-place tablespaces
- f6f0db4d6240 15.0 landed
-
Fix pg_basebackup with in-place tablespaces.
- c6f2f01611d4 15.0 landed