Horton

Re: Missing include <openssl/x509.h> in be-secure-openssl.c?

Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, 近藤雄太 <kondo@sraoss.co.jp>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, buildfarm@sraoss.co.jp
Date: 2021-11-04T03:37:47Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 4:33 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> But I don't get the point about where HEAD is different from v14?
> be-secure-openssl.c isn't.

I don't understand what's going on and I don't have the headers to
look at, but I was thinking that WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN must be causing a
different state to be reached that somehow leaves the bad definition
of X509_NAME in place.  It's confusing though, because you'd hope
that'd cause *less* stuff to get defined...

Commits

  1. contrib/sslinfo needs a fix too to make hamerkop happy.

  2. Second attempt to silence SSL compile failures on hamerkop.

  3. Blind attempt to silence SSL compile failures on hamerkop.