Re: Should we add xid_current() or a int8->xid cast?

Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>

From: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>

To: Mark Dilger <hornschnorter@gmail.com>

Cc: btfujiitkp <btfujiitkp@oss.nttdata.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

Date: 2019-12-01T01:14:03Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

Attachments

0001-Add-SQL-type-xid8-to-expose-FullTransactionId-to--v4.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v4-0001
0002-Introduce-xid8-variants-of-the-txid_XXX-fmgr-func-v4.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v4-0002

On Sun, Dec 1, 2019 at 12:22 PM Mark Dilger <hornschnorter@gmail.com> wrote:
> These two patches (v3) no longer apply cleanly.  Could you please
> rebase?

Hi Mark,
Thanks.  Here's v4.

Commits

Introduce xid8-based functions to replace txid_XXX.
- 4c04be9b05ad 13.0 landed
Add SQL type xid8 to expose FullTransactionId to users.
- aeec457de8a8 13.0 landed
Replace the former method of determining snapshot xmax --- to wit, calling
- 6bd4f401b0cb 8.3.0 cited