Re: Regression tests fail on OpenBSD due to low semmns value

On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 6:00 PM Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com> wrote:
> It turned out that OpenBSD has semmns as low as 60 (see [4])

Whenever I run into this, or my Mac requires manual ipcrm to clean up
leaked SysV kernel junk, I rebase my patch for sema_kind = 'futex'.
Here it goes.  It could be updated to support NetBSD I believe, but I
didn't try as its futex stuff came out later.

Then I remember why I didn't go anywhere with it.  It triggers a
thought loop about flipping it all around: use futexes to implement
lwlocks directly in place, and get rid of semaphores completely, but
that involves a few rabbit holes and sub-projects.  From memory:
classic r/w lock implementation on futexes is tricky but doable in the
portability constraints, futex fallback implementation even works
surprisingly well but has fun memory map sub-problems, actually lwlock
is not really a classic r/w lock as it has sprouted extra funky APIs
that lead the intrepid rabbit-holer to design an entirely different
new concurrency primitive that is really wanted for those users, a
couple of other places use raw semaphores directly namely procarray.c
and clog.c and if you stare at those for long you will be overwhelmed
with a desire to rewrite them, EOVERFLOW.