Re: PRI?64 vs Visual Studio (2022)

Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>

From: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>

To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>, walther@technowledgy.de, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org

Date: 2025-12-17T23:56:13Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Dec 16, 2025 at 12:15 AM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2025 at 8:01 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > So their gettext handles PRIu64 and PRIu32 and nothing else.
>
> Hah, I had predicted that three would work.  Off by one.
>
> > What to do now?  I could revert 8c498479d and followups, but
> > I sure don't want to.  A stopgap measure to make the farm look
> > green would be to add a variant expected-file that accepts
> > this output, but yech.  Thoughts?
>
> So close yet so far... I tried asking if it's easy to fix:
>
> https://github.com/sabotage-linux/gettext-tiny/issues/76

Problem ack'd.  It looks like they want to fix it.  Fingers crossed.