Horton

Re: effective_io_concurrency's steampunk spindle maths

Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2020-05-14T11:34:53Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 6:58 AM Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
> Shouldn't you close out the "Should we rename
> effective_io_concurrency?" Postgres 13 open item now?

Yeah, that doesn't really seem worth the churn.  I'll move it to the
resolved list in a day or two if no one shows up to argue for a
rename.

Commits

  1. Introduce a maintenance_io_concurrency setting.

  2. Simplify the effective_io_concurrency setting.