Re: Cannot find a working 64-bit integer type on Illumos
Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
From: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas@vondra.me>, Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>, Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2024-12-04T22:45:50Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- 0001-Fix-header-inclusion-order-in-c.h.patch (text/x-patch) patch 0001
- 0002-Add-required-headers-to-postgres_ext.h.patch (text/x-patch) patch 0002
On Thu, Dec 5, 2024 at 10:58 AM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 5, 2024 at 10:55 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Could another way be to read pg_config.h before postgres_ext.h? > > I think the current order was intentional, but maybe the > > disadvantages outweigh the advantages now. > > Yeah I was just testing that idea :-) I can't see why it needs to be > first, but was looking for what the original reason was... Seems good to me. Also there were another couple of contortions due to the older ordering, which we could improve I think?
Commits
-
Move pg_int64 back to postgres_ext.h
- e56a601e0678 19 (unreleased) landed
- 409543da5411 18.0 landed
-
pgbench: Make set_random_seed() 64-bit everywhere.
- 53a2a1564ae4 18.0 landed
-
Use PRI?64 instead of "ll?" in format strings (continued).
- a0ed19e0a9ef 18.0 landed
-
Fix order of -I switches for building pg_regress.o.
- f186f90e55b7 17.5 landed
- cb36f8ec2124 18.0 landed
-
libpq: Deprecate pg_int64.
- 3c86223c9982 18.0 landed
-
Use PRI*64 instead of "ll*" in format strings (minimal trial)
- 15a79c73111f 18.0 landed
-
Fix header inclusion order in c.h.
- 71cb352904c1 18.0 landed
-
Use <stdint.h> and <inttypes.h> for c.h integers.
- 962da900ac8f 18.0 landed
-
Remove traces of BeOS.
- a2d9a9b95ad9 18.0 landed
-
More correct way to check for existence of types, which allows to specify
- 15abc7788e66 7.2.1 cited