Re: Cannot find a working 64-bit integer type on Illumos

Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>

From: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas@vondra.me>, Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>, Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2024-12-04T22:45:50Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Attachments

On Thu, Dec 5, 2024 at 10:58 AM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2024 at 10:55 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > Could another way be to read pg_config.h before postgres_ext.h?
> > I think the current order was intentional, but maybe the
> > disadvantages outweigh the advantages now.
>
> Yeah I was just testing that idea :-)  I can't see why it needs to be
> first, but was looking for what the original reason was...

Seems good to me.  Also there were another couple of contortions due
to the older ordering, which we could improve I think?

Commits

  1. Move pg_int64 back to postgres_ext.h

  2. pgbench: Make set_random_seed() 64-bit everywhere.

  3. Use PRI?64 instead of "ll?" in format strings (continued).

  4. Fix order of -I switches for building pg_regress.o.

  5. libpq: Deprecate pg_int64.

  6. Use PRI*64 instead of "ll*" in format strings (minimal trial)

  7. Fix header inclusion order in c.h.

  8. Use <stdint.h> and <inttypes.h> for c.h integers.

  9. Remove traces of BeOS.

  10. More correct way to check for existence of types, which allows to specify