Re: LLVM compile failing in seawasp
Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
From: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: didier <did447@gmail.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, buildfarm@coelho.net
Date: 2019-07-27T05:12:19Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 12:13 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > didier <did447@gmail.com> writes: > > c.h defines a C Min macro conflicting with llvm new class > > llvm:ElementCount Min member > > Really? Well, we will hardly be the only code they broke with that. > I think we can just wait for them to reconsider. FYI This is now on LLVM's release_90 branch, due out on August 28. -- Thomas Munro https://enterprisedb.com
Commits
-
Avoid macro clash with LLVM 9.
- 0ef70bbaddb6 11.5 landed
- 180825fe43ec 12.0 landed
- a2a777d01197 13.0 landed