Re: LLVM compile failing in seawasp

Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>

From: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: didier <did447@gmail.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, buildfarm@coelho.net
Date: 2019-07-27T05:12:19Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 12:13 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> didier <did447@gmail.com> writes:
> > c.h defines a C Min macro conflicting with llvm new class
> > llvm:ElementCount Min member
>
> Really?  Well, we will hardly be the only code they broke with that.
> I think we can just wait for them to reconsider.

FYI This is now on LLVM's release_90 branch, due out on August 28.

-- 
Thomas Munro
https://enterprisedb.com



Commits

  1. Avoid macro clash with LLVM 9.