Horton

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Windows Application Issues | PostgreSQL | REF # 48475607

Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>

View thread
From: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
To: "Haifang Wang (Centific Technologies Inc)" <v-haiwang@microsoft.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Rahul Pandey <pandeyrah@microsoft.com>, Vishwa Deepak <Vishwa.Deepak@microsoft.com>, Shawn Steele <Shawn.Steele@microsoft.com>, Amy Wishnousky <amyw@microsoft.com>, "pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org" <pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org>, Shweta Gulati <gulatishweta@microsoft.com>, Ashish Nawal <nawalashish@microsoft.com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Date: 2024-06-05T06:20:26Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

  1. Reject non-ASCII locale names.

On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 12:13 PM Haifang Wang (Centific Technologies
Inc) <v-haiwang@microsoft.com> wrote:
> Thanks, Tom. Is there any suggestion on how to track all the conversations in one thread? Seems like all our previous discussion are in different mail thread. It is not easy to track. 😊

FWIW this shows up as one thread in my email client, and in the
PostgreSQL archives website[1].  I don't know much about email and
which RFCs or conventions are at work here, but apparently different
clients are using different techniques to identify threads.  I assume
it could be done with thread headers (as seen in this thread) or
reply-to chains or fuzzy recognition of subject etc.  Given that
Outlook seems to ignore the "> " inline response quoting convention
used by the rest of the internet, it wouldn't surprise me to hear that
it also doesn't follow the conventions for recognising threads either,
being a sort of related topic.

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/PH8PR21MB3902F334A3174C54058F792CE5182%40PH8PR21MB3902.namprd21.prod.outlook.com