Thread

Commits

  1. Fix typos in comments.

  1. Fix typo in procarrary.c

    Masahiko Sawada <masahiko.sawada@2ndquadrant.com> — 2020-08-21T01:58:27Z

    Hi,
    
    I've attached the patch for $subject.
    
    s/replications lots/replication slots/
    
    Regards,
    
    -- 
    Masahiko Sawada            http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
    PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
    
  2. Re: Fix typo in procarrary.c

    Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> — 2020-08-21T02:17:58Z

    
    On 2020/08/21 10:58, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
    > Hi,
    > 
    > I've attached the patch for $subject.
    > 
    > s/replications lots/replication slots/
    
    Thanks for the patch!
    
    Also it's better to s/replications slots/replication slots/ ?
    
    --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c
    +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c
    @@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ typedef struct ComputeXidHorizonsResult
              * be removed.
              *
              * This likely should only be needed to determine whether pg_subtrans can
    -        * be truncated. It currently includes the effects of replications slots,
    +        * be truncated. It currently includes the effects of replication slots,
              * for historical reasons. But that could likely be changed.
              */
             TransactionId oldest_considered_running;
    
    Regards,
    
    -- 
    Fujii Masao
    Advanced Computing Technology Center
    Research and Development Headquarters
    NTT DATA CORPORATION
    
    
    
    
  3. Re: Fix typo in procarrary.c

    Masahiko Sawada <masahiko.sawada@2ndquadrant.com> — 2020-08-21T03:29:22Z

    On Fri, 21 Aug 2020 at 11:18, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> wrote:
    >
    >
    >
    > On 2020/08/21 10:58, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
    > > Hi,
    > >
    > > I've attached the patch for $subject.
    > >
    > > s/replications lots/replication slots/
    >
    > Thanks for the patch!
    >
    > Also it's better to s/replications slots/replication slots/ ?
    >
    > --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c
    > +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c
    > @@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ typedef struct ComputeXidHorizonsResult
    >           * be removed.
    >           *
    >           * This likely should only be needed to determine whether pg_subtrans can
    > -        * be truncated. It currently includes the effects of replications slots,
    > +        * be truncated. It currently includes the effects of replication slots,
    >           * for historical reasons. But that could likely be changed.
    >           */
    >          TransactionId oldest_considered_running;
    >
    
    Indeed. I agree with you.
    
    Regards,
    
    -- 
    Masahiko Sawada            http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
    PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
    
    
    
    
  4. Re: Fix typo in procarrary.c

    Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> — 2020-08-21T03:39:37Z

    
    On 2020/08/21 12:29, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
    > On Fri, 21 Aug 2020 at 11:18, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> wrote:
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> On 2020/08/21 10:58, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
    >>> Hi,
    >>>
    >>> I've attached the patch for $subject.
    >>>
    >>> s/replications lots/replication slots/
    >>
    >> Thanks for the patch!
    >>
    >> Also it's better to s/replications slots/replication slots/ ?
    >>
    >> --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c
    >> +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c
    >> @@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ typedef struct ComputeXidHorizonsResult
    >>            * be removed.
    >>            *
    >>            * This likely should only be needed to determine whether pg_subtrans can
    >> -        * be truncated. It currently includes the effects of replications slots,
    >> +        * be truncated. It currently includes the effects of replication slots,
    >>            * for historical reasons. But that could likely be changed.
    >>            */
    >>           TransactionId oldest_considered_running;
    >>
    > 
    > Indeed. I agree with you.
    
    Thanks! So I pushed both fixes.
    
    Regards,
    
    -- 
    Fujii Masao
    Advanced Computing Technology Center
    Research and Development Headquarters
    NTT DATA CORPORATION
    
    
    
    
  5. Re: Fix typo in procarrary.c

    Masahiko Sawada <masahiko.sawada@2ndquadrant.com> — 2020-08-21T06:16:44Z

    On Fri, 21 Aug 2020 at 12:39, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> wrote:
    >
    >
    >
    > On 2020/08/21 12:29, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
    > > On Fri, 21 Aug 2020 at 11:18, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> wrote:
    > >>
    > >>
    > >>
    > >> On 2020/08/21 10:58, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
    > >>> Hi,
    > >>>
    > >>> I've attached the patch for $subject.
    > >>>
    > >>> s/replications lots/replication slots/
    > >>
    > >> Thanks for the patch!
    > >>
    > >> Also it's better to s/replications slots/replication slots/ ?
    > >>
    > >> --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c
    > >> +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c
    > >> @@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ typedef struct ComputeXidHorizonsResult
    > >>            * be removed.
    > >>            *
    > >>            * This likely should only be needed to determine whether pg_subtrans can
    > >> -        * be truncated. It currently includes the effects of replications slots,
    > >> +        * be truncated. It currently includes the effects of replication slots,
    > >>            * for historical reasons. But that could likely be changed.
    > >>            */
    > >>           TransactionId oldest_considered_running;
    > >>
    > >
    > > Indeed. I agree with you.
    >
    > Thanks! So I pushed both fixes.
    >
    
    Thanks!
    
    Regards,
    
    -- 
    Masahiko Sawada            http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
    PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services