Re: [PATCH] Fix memory leak in pgstat_progress_parallel_incr_param()

Baji Shaik <baji.pgdev@gmail.com>

From: Baji Shaik <baji.pgdev@gmail.com>
To: Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com>
Cc: Tristan Partin <tristan@partin.io>, bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2026-06-06T16:04:32Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Attachments

On Sat, Jun 6, 2026 at 9:55 AM Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com> wrote:

> >   0002: allocate the static buffer once per process via
> >         pq_beginmessage_reuse / pq_endmessage_reuse, to avoid the
> >         per-call allocation (master only)
>
> I am less convinced this will have any benefits for the additional
> complexity.
> The callers of pgstat_progress_parallel_incr_param() are not frequent
> enough
> to make a measurable difference here. cost delay reporting for parallel
> workers
> is throttled by PARALLEL_VACUUM_DELAY_REPORT_INTERVAL_NS and
> index progress reporting does not happen very frequently either.


Thanks for the review, Sami.

Agreed, at those call frequencies the per-call palloc is not worth
the added complexity. Dropping 0002.

v3 attached (just 0001, unchanged from previous).

Thanks,
Baji Shaik.

Commits

  1. Fix memory leak in pgstat_progress_parallel_incr_param()