Re: Suggestion to add --continue-client-on-abort option to pgbench
Stepan Neretin <slpmcf@gmail.com>
From: Stepan Neretin <slpmcf@gmail.com>
To: ikedarintarof <ikedarintarof@oss.nttdata.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2025-05-10T15:02:06Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
pgbench: Fix assertion failure with multiple \syncpipeline in pipeline mode.
- 5bc251b28839 17.8 landed
- 00e64e35c8bd 18.2 landed
- 4aa0ac05765e 19 (unreleased) landed
-
pgbench: Add --continue-on-error option.
- 0ab208fa505c 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Fix "inconsistent DLL linkage" warning on Windows MSVC
- a3ea5330fcf4 19 (unreleased) cited
-
pgbench: Fix error reporting in readCommandResponse().
- 7d7e81d1e6b8 13.23 landed
- cb21e1f92fb3 14.20 landed
- bdccb6302871 15.15 landed
- 36c4d30c8f24 16.11 landed
- a912118c6055 17.7 landed
- 29aabbc43269 18.1 landed
- 19d4f9ffc207 19 (unreleased) landed
-
pgbench: Fix assertion failure with retriable errors in pipeline mode.
- 704f517711b4 15.15 landed
- 8b2e290bde21 16.11 landed
- f39d9164b70a 17.7 landed
- c736808e03b7 18.1 landed
- 8bb174295e89 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Allow pgbench to retry in some cases.
- 4a39f87acd6e 15.0 cited
On Sat, May 10, 2025 at 8:45 PM ikedarintarof <ikedarintarof@oss.nttdata.com> wrote: > Hi hackers, > > I would like to suggest adding a new option to pgbench, which enables > the client to continue processing transactions even if some errors occur > during a transaction. > Currently, a client stops sending requests when its transaction is > aborted due to reasons other than serialization failures or deadlocks. I > think in some cases, especially when using custom scripts, the client > should be able to rollback the failed transaction and start a new one. > > For example, my custom script (insert_to_unique_column.sql) follows: > ``` > CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS test (col1 serial, col2 int unique); > INSERT INTO test (col2) VALUES (random(0, 50000)); > ``` > Assume we need to continuously apply load to the server using 5 clients > for a certain period of time. However, a client sometimes stops when its > transaction in my custom script is aborted due to a check constraint > violation. As a result, the load on the server is lower than expected, > which is the problem I want to address. > > The proposed new option solves this problem. When > --continue-client-on-abort is set to true, the client rolls back the > failed transaction and starts a new one. This allows all 5 clients to > continuously apply load to the server, even if some transactions fail. > > ``` > % bin/pgbench -d postgres -f ../insert_to_unique_column.sql -T 10 > --failures-detailed --continue-client-on-error > transaction type: ../custom_script_insert.sql > scaling factor: 1 > query mode: simple > number of clients: 1 > number of threads: 1 > maximum number of tries: 1 > duration: 10 s > number of transactions actually processed: 33552 > number of failed transactions: 21901 (39.495%) > number of serialization failures: 0 (0.000%) > number of deadlock failures: 0 (0.000%) > number of other failures: 21901 (39.495%) > latency average = 0.180 ms (including failures) > initial connection time = 2.857 ms > tps = 3356.092385 (without initial connection time) > ``` > > I have attached the patch. I would appreciate your feedback. > > Best regards, > > Rintaro Ikeda > NTT DATA Corporation Japan Hi Rintaro, Thanks for the patch and explanation. I understand your goal is to ensure that pgbench clients continue running even when some transactions fail due to application-level errors (e.g., constraint violations), especially when running custom scripts. However, I wonder if the intended behavior can't already be achieved using standard SQL constructs — specifically ON CONFLICT or careful transaction structure. For example, your sample script: CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS test (col1 serial, col2 int unique); INSERT INTO test (col2) VALUES (random(0, 50000)); can be rewritten as: \setrandom val 0 50000 INSERT INTO test (col2) VALUES (:val) ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING; This avoids transaction aborts entirely in the presence of uniqueness violations and ensures the client continues to issue load without interruption. In many real-world benchmarking scenarios, this is the preferred and simplest approach. So from that angle, could you elaborate on specific cases where this SQL-level workaround wouldn't be sufficient? Are there error types you intend to handle that cannot be gracefully avoided or recovered from using SQL constructs like ON CONFLICT, or SAVEPOINT/ROLLBACK TO? Best regards, Stepan Neretin