Re: Possibility to disable `ALTER SYSTEM`
Gabriele Bartolini <gabriele.bartolini@enterprisedb.com>
From: Gabriele Bartolini <gabriele.bartolini@enterprisedb.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2023-09-08T11:31:16Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Add allow_alter_system GUC.
- d3ae2a24f265 17.0 landed
-
Rename COMPAT_OPTIONS_CLIENT to COMPAT_OPTIONS_OTHER.
- de7e96bd0fc6 17.0 landed
-
Remove support for version-0 calling conventions.
- 5ded4bd21403 10.0 cited
Hi Tom, On Thu, 7 Sept 2023 at 22:27, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Gabriele Bartolini <gabriele.bartolini@enterprisedb.com> writes: > > I would like to propose a patch that allows administrators to disable > > `ALTER SYSTEM` via either a runt-time option to pass to the Postgres > server > > process at startup (e.g. `--disable-alter-system=true`, false by default) > > or a new GUC (or even both), without changing the current default method > of > > the server. > > ALTER SYSTEM is already heavily restricted. Could you please help me better understand what you mean here? > I don't think we need random kluges added to the permissions system. If you allow me, why do you think disabling ALTER SYSTEM altogether is a random kluge? Again, I'd like to better understand this position. I've personally been in many conversations on the security side of things for Postgres in Kubernetes environments, and this is a frequent concern by users who request that changes to the Postgres system (not a database) should only be done declaratively and prevented from within the system. Thanks, Gabriele -- Gabriele Bartolini Vice President, Cloud Native at EDB enterprisedb.com