Re: BUG #18336: Inconsistency in PostgreSQL 16 Documentation for SHOW Command
Imran Zaheer <imran.zhir@gmail.com>
From: Imran Zaheer <imran.zhir@gmail.com>
To: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>, masano@sraoss.co.jp, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2024-08-17T05:21:58Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs
Hi, The website[1] still shows the redundant LC_COLLATE & LC_CTYPE params. Are we planning to update them? Thanks Imran [1]: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/sql-show.html On Sat, Aug 17, 2024 at 2:09 PM Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> wrote: > > On Wed, 2024-02-07 at 08:49 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > On 07.02.24 05:01, Laurenz Albe wrote: > > > On Wed, 2024-02-07 at 02:25 +0000, PG Bug reporting form wrote: > > > > In the PostgreSQL 16 release notes, there is an entry stating that the > > > > read-only server variables lc_collate and lc_ctype have been removed. > > > > However, the documentation for the SHOW command on the PostgreSQL official > > > > website (https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/sql-show.html) still lists > > > > lc_collate and lc_ctype as valid variables. > > > > > > Right; here is a patch for that. > > > > I think the whole list of read-only options on the SHOW reference page > > is redundant and incomplete. A more complete list is at <sect1 > > id="runtime-config-preset"> in config.sgml. This includes > > server_version and server_encoding, but not is_superuser. Maybe that's > > an omission? I think we should get rid of the list on the SHOW > > reference page. > > That is much better; here is a patch. > > Yours, > Laurenz Albe