Re: Commits 8de72b and 5457a1 (COPY FREEZE)

Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>

From: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
To: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2012-12-22T00:42:43Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 21 December 2012 20:10, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote:

> I thought of one case where we do currently forget rd_newRelfilenodeSubid:
>
> BEGIN;
> TRUNCATE t;
> SAVEPOINT save;
> TRUNCATE t;
> ROLLBACK TO save;

That's a weird one. Aborting a subtransacton that sets it, when it was
already set.

The loss of rd_newRelfilenodeSubid in that case is deterministic, but
tracking the full complexity of multiple relations and multiple nested
subxids isn't worth the trouble for such rare cases [assumption].

I'd go for just setting an its_too_complex flag (with better name)
that we can use to trigger a message in COPY to say that FREEZE option
won't be honoured. That would then be completely consistent, rather
than the lack of deterministic behaviour that Robert rightly objects
to.

-- 
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Keep rd_newRelfilenodeSubid across overflow.

  2. Reduce scope of changes for COPY FREEZE.

  3. COPY FREEZE and mark committed on fresh tables.