Re: Separating bgwriter and checkpointer

Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>

From: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
To: "Dickson S. Guedes" <listas@guedesoft.net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-10-18T13:18:26Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 8:02 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 5:10 AM, Dickson S. Guedes <listas@guedesoft.net> wrote:
>
>> Ah ok! I started reviewing the v4 patch version, this is my comments:
>
> ...
>
>> Well, all the tests was running with the default postgresql.conf in my
>> laptop but I'll setup a more "real world" environment to test for
>> performance regression. Until now I couldn't notice any significant
>> difference in TPS before and after patch in a small environment. I'll
>> post something soon.
>
> Great testing, thanks. Likely will have no effect in non-I/O swamped
> environment, but no regression expected either.


Any reason or objection to committing this patch?


-- 
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services