Re: Enabling Checksums
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
From: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
To: Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2013-03-04T07:11:36Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 3 March 2013 18:24, Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > The 16-bit checksum feature seems functional, with two sources of overhead. > There's some CPU time burned to compute checksums when pages enter the > system. And there's extra overhead for WAL logging hint bits. I'll > quantify both of those better in another message. It's crunch time. Do you and Jeff believe this patch should be committed to Postgres core? Are there objectors? -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services