Re: Enabling Checksums

Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>

From: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
To: Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2013-03-04T07:11:36Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 3 March 2013 18:24, Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:

> The 16-bit checksum feature seems functional, with two sources of overhead.
> There's some CPU time burned to compute checksums when pages enter the
> system.  And there's extra overhead for WAL logging hint bits.  I'll
> quantify both of those better in another message.

It's crunch time. Do you and Jeff believe this patch should be
committed to Postgres core?

Are there objectors?

-- 
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services