Re: [REVIEW] pg_last_xact_insert_timestamp

Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>

From: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@oss.ntt.co.jp>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-10-04T13:15:11Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Treat 2PC commit/abort the same as regular xacts in recovery.

On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 5:33 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Sorry, but I still don't really think it's fair to say that you've
>>>> proposed a solution to this problem.  Or if you have, neither I nor
>>>> Fujii Masao understand that proposal well enough to decide whether we
>>>> like it.
>>>
>>> Arguing between trenches doesn't really get us anywhere.
>>>
>>> As ever, when someone claims to have a better solution then it is up
>>> to them to prove that is the case.
>>
>> So... are you going to do that?
>
> Simon, could you? If your proposal turns out to be better than mine, I'd be
> happy to agree to drop my patch and adopt yours.

Yes, will do.

-- 
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services