Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
From: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Cc: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2012-01-02T19:54:33Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Add bytea_agg, parallel to string_agg.
- d5448c7d31b5 9.2.0 cited
-
Fix ALTER TABLE ONLY .. DROP CONSTRAINT.
- c0f03aae0469 9.2.0 cited
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 7:49 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote: > > Excerpts from Noah Misch's message of lun ene 02 16:39:09 -0300 2012: >> >> On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 04:33:28PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > >> > Uh, I thought detoasting had its own visibility test function .. I mean, >> > otherwise, what is HeapTupleSatisfiesToast for? >> >> The SnapshotNow scan was actually to build the relcache entry for the toast >> table before scanning the toast table itself. Stack trace: > > Oh, right, that makes sense. Certainly does. Thanks Noah, much appreciated. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services