Re: Initial 9.2 pgbench write results
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
From: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2012-02-27T19:12:07Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Fix I/O-conversion-related memory leaks in plpgsql.
- 58a9596ed4a5 9.2.0 cited
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 3:50 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> That isn't the case. We have evidence that the current knobs are >> hugely ineffective in some cases. >> >> Turning the bgwriter off is hardly "adjusting a setting", its >> admitting that there is no useful setting. >> >> I've suggested changes that aren't possible by tuning the current knobs. > > OK, fair point. But I don't think any of us - Greg included - have an > enormously clear idea why turning the background writer off is > improving performance in some cases. I think we need to understand > that better before we start changing things. I wasn't suggesting we make a change without testing. The theory that the bgwriter is doing too much work needs to be tested, so we need a proposal for how to reduce that work in a coherent way so we can test, which is what I've given. Other proposals are also possible. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services