Re: Support for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
From: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2012-12-07T13:33:21Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 7 December 2012 12:37, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote: > There are still two things that are missing in this patch, but I would like > to have more feedback before moving forward: > - REINDEX CONCURRENTLY needs tests in src/test/isolation Yes, it needs those > - There is still a problem with toast indexes. If the concurrent reindex of > a toast index fails for a reason or another, pg_relation will finish with > invalid toast index entries. I am still wondering about how to clean up > that. Any ideas? Build another toast index, rather than reindexing the existing one, then just use the new oid. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Background worker processes
- da07a1e85651 9.3.0 cited
-
Fix assorted bugs in CREATE/DROP INDEX CONCURRENTLY.
- 3c84046490be 9.3.0 cited
-
Work around unportable behavior of malloc(0) and realloc(NULL, 0).
- 09ac603c36d1 9.3.0 cited
-
Properly set relpersistence for fake relcache entries.
- beb850e1d873 9.3.0 cited