Re: get rid of Pointer type, mostly
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: David Geier <geidav.pg@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-11-24T19:05:14Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Remove no longer needed casts from Pointer
- e158fd4d68f4 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Remove no longer needed casts to Pointer
- c6be3daa054a 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Change Pointer to void *
- 1b2bb5077e9e 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Don't rely on pointer arithmetic with Pointer type
- 756a43689324 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Use more appropriate DatumGet* function
- 8c6bbd674ed8 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Remove useless casts to Pointer
- 623801b3bdb4 19 (unreleased) landed
On Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 1:46 PM David Geier <geidav.pg@gmail.com> wrote: > The GIN code makes use of pointer but src/backend/access/gin only has 29 > occurrences. If you like I can help out fixing up the GIN code and share > a page here. Let me know. I'd go for it! I mean, who knows whether your patch will be accepted? But another pair of eyes couldn't hurt. It seems like we all agree that a full removal of Pointer would be better than a partial removal; it's just a question of whether we can get there without too much other awkwardness. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com