Re: mat views stats
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@bluetreble.com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>,
Jim Mlodgenski <jimmy76@gmail.com>, PgHacker <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2017-02-26T16:49:21Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 11:13 AM, Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@bluetreble.com> wrote: > Certainly easier, but I don't think it'd be better. Matviews really aren't > the same thing as tables. Off-hand (without reviewing the patch), update and > delete counts certainly wouldn't make any sense. "Insert" counts might, in > as much as it's how many rows have been added by refreshes. You'd want a > refresh count too. Regular REFRESH truncates the view and repopulates it, but REFRESH CONCURRENTLY does inserts, updates, and deletes as needed to adjust the contents. So I think all the same counters that make sense for regular tables are also sensible here. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Fix REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW to report activity to the stats collector.
- 17f8ffa1e331 10.0 landed