Re: Declarative partitioning - another take

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar.raghuwanshi@enterprisedb.com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Date: 2017-05-10T03:59:34Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 11:54 PM, Thomas Munro
<thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> +    A statement that targets a parent table in a inheritance or partitioning
>
> A tiny typo: s/a inheritance/an inheritance/

Now he tells me.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


Commits

  1. Fix typo.

  2. Document trigger-firing behavior for inheritance/partitioning.

  3. Fire per-statement triggers on partitioned tables.

  4. Set ecxt_scantuple correctly for tuple routing.

  5. Fix interaction of partitioned tables with BulkInsertState.

  6. Avoid core dump for empty prepared statement in an aborted transaction.

  7. Fix some problems in check_new_partition_bound().

  8. Remove unnecessary arguments from partitioning functions.

  9. Fix reporting of constraint violations for table partitioning.

  10. Fix tuple routing in cases where tuple descriptors don't match.

  11. Invalid parent's relcache after CREATE TABLE .. PARTITION OF.

  12. Doc: improve documentation about inheritance.