Re: make async slave to wait for lsn to be replayed
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Ants Aasma <ants.aasma@eesti.ee>
Cc: Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>,
Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>, Ivan Kartyshov <i.kartyshov@postgrespro.ru>,
Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>, David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>, "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2017-10-26T11:38:53Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 12:00 PM, Ants Aasma <ants.aasma@eesti.ee> wrote: > Exposing this interface as WAITLSN will encode that visibility order > matches LSN order. That would be a bad thing to encode because it doesn't. Well... actually on the standby it does, and that's the only thing that matters in this case I guess. But I agree with you that's it's not a wonderful thing to bake into the UI, because we might want to change it some day. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Commits
-
Implement waiting for given lsn at transaction start
- 0f5ca02f53ac 13.0 landed