Horton

Re: [PATCH] Unremovable tuple monitoring

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

View thread
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga@gmail.com>
Cc: Royce Ausburn <royce.ml@inomial.com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>, Kevin Grittner <kevin.grittner@wicourts.gov>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: 2011-11-15T15:16:54Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga@gmail.com> wrote:
> I reviewed your patch. I think it is in good shape, my two main remarks
> (name of n_unremovable_tup and a remark about documentation at the end of
> this review) are highly subjective and I wouldn't spend time on it unless
> other people have the same opinion.

I share your opinion; it's not obvious to me what this means either.
I guess this is a dumb question, but why don't we remove all the dead
tuples?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company