Re: BRIN indexes - TRAP: BadArgument
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>,
Emanuel Calvo <3manuek@esdebian.org>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>,
Nicolas Barbier <nicolas.barbier@gmail.com>,
Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>,
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>,
Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2014-09-23T23:23:06Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 3:04 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Alvaro Herrera wrote: >> Heikki Linnakangas wrote: >> > If you add a new datatype, and define b-tree operators for it, what >> > is required to create a minmax opclass for it? Would it be possible >> > to generalize the functions in brin_minmax.c so that they can be >> > reused for any datatype (with b-tree operators) without writing any >> > new C code? I think we're almost there; the only thing that differs >> > between each data type is the opcinfo function. Let's pass the type >> > OID as argument to the opcinfo function. You could then have just a >> > single minmax_opcinfo function, instead of the macro to generate a >> > separate function for each built-in datatype. >> >> Yeah, that's how I had that initially. I changed it to what it's now as >> part of a plan to enable building cross-type opclasses, so you could >> have "WHERE int8col=42" without requiring a cast of the constant to type >> int8. This might have been a thinko, because AFAICS it's possible to >> build them with a constant opcinfo as well (I changed several other >> things to support this, as described in a previous email.) I will look >> into this later. > > I found out that we don't really throw errors in such cases anymore; we > insert casts instead. Maybe there's a performance argument that it > might be better to use existing cross-type operators than casting, but > justifying this work just turned a lot harder. Here's a patch that > reverts opcinfo into a generic function that receives the type OID. > > I will look into adding some testing mechanism for the union support > proc; with that I will just consider the patch ready for commit and will > push. With all respect, I think this is a bad idea. I know you've put a lot of energy into this patch and I'm confident it's made a lot of progress. But as with Stephen's patch, the final form deserves a thorough round of looking over by someone else before it goes in. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Commits
-
Refactor per-page logic common to all redo routines to a new function.
- f8f4227976a2 9.5.0 cited
-
Reduce use of heavyweight locking inside hash AM.
- 76837c1507cb 9.3.0 cited
-
Scan the buffer pool just once, not once per fork, during relation drop.
- ece01aae4792 9.2.0 cited
-
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov>
- 9e2a87b62db8 7.1.1 cited