Horton

Re: Switch to multi-inserts for pg_depend

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Date: 2020-08-11T15:02:59Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 1:59 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 05:32:21PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> > Do we really want to end up with several separate defines for different
> > type of catalog batch inserts? That doesn't seem like a good
> > thing. Think there should be a single define for all catalog bulk
> > inserts.
>
> Unlikely so, but I kept them separate to potentially lower the
> threshold of 64kB for catalog rows that have a lower average size than
> pg_attribute.

Uh, why would we want to do that?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Commits

  1. Switch to multi-inserts when registering dependencies for many code paths

  2. Use multi-inserts for pg_depend