Re: Hash support for row types
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>,
pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2020-10-20T18:41:08Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 11:10 AM Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 2020-10-20 01:32, Andres Freund wrote: > > How does this deal with row types with a field that doesn't have a hash > > function? Erroring out at runtime could cause queries that used to > > succeed, e.g. because all fields have btree ops, to fail, if we just have > > a generic unconditionally present hash opclass? Is that an OK > > "regression"? > > Good point. There is actually code in the type cache that is supposed > to handle that, so I'll need to adjust that. Do we need to worry about what happens if somebody modifies the opclass/opfamily definitions? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Commits
-
Hash support for row types
- 01e658fa74cb 14.0 landed
-
Add more tests for hashing and hash-based plans
- 6dd8b0080787 14.0 landed