Re: SET ROLE documentation improvement
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>,
"Andrey M. Borodin" <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>, Yurii Rashkovskii <yrashk@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2024-04-11T17:38:37Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 1:03 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 11:48:30AM -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 11:36:52AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > >> I suggest that we close the existing CF entry as committed and > >> somebody can start a new one for whatever remains. I think that will > >> be less confusing. > > > > Done: https://commitfest.postgresql.org/48/4923/. > > While it's fresh on my mind, I very hastily hacked together a draft of what > I believe is the remaining work. That looks fine to me. And if others agree, I think it's fine to just commit this now, post-freeze. It's only a doc change, and a back-patchable one if you want to go that route. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
Commits
-
doc: Note exceptions for SET ROLE's effect on privilege checks.
- 953cf49e166a 17.0 landed
-
doc: Clarify requirements for SET ROLE.
- d82dc79ba03c 16.3 landed
- 3330a8d1b792 17.0 landed